Unidentifiable Transformation

We’re suckers for rapid, identifiable transformation. It drives investment. It drives news cycles. It drives Twitter.

Calculated, unidentifiable transformation is a much murkier proposition (which is, perhaps, why the changes in China scare the hell out of so many Westerners). It’s also a big part of the reason for the collective impatience with President Obama – who promised change (but did not promise that it would be instantly recognizable).

I’ve noted frequently here, and in a particularly robust conversation with Gareth Kay, that there exists tremendous inherent value for brands in mundane, incremental change that reveals itself only through the larger transformations it enables. Consider the massively incremental transformations at HP as outlined by Carly Fiorina some years ago or the slow evolution of IBM into a services provider.

Reinvention is Coming

Leigh over at the inappropriately-titled Leigh’s Blitherings (her prose is several levels above blather) posted yesterday on the notion of reinvention – a more-pleasant wrapper on the not-so-long-ago-vogue notion of creative destruction. Her premise – and I think it to be a good one – is that an increasing number of corporations are coming to [...]